3 mutts and a couple of passable chicks-one with the tablespoon treatment-sigh(Wishing for good porno)

5 at a time release means less work to keep the site going.5 crappy releases at a time means fewer subscribers.If you noticed,crappy releases from the "premium channels" Evil Angels and Vivid as well.Reality Kings sucks-as usual-too much of the smarmy guys acting slick for the camera,and of the 59 releases from Kink,they are already re-posting.VB,are you TRYING to drive your subscribers away?

Big Tits Curvy Asses and Ugly as Hell-not to mention plain 'ol fat.

I would have to say the best of the bunch today,imo.On a side note:We see plenty of women spread open their asses,but what ever happened to the good 'ol spread beaver shot?Pretty rare these days.Sure would like to see more chicks laying back and opening up.

As with most "feature" type films,the action starts after an annoying set up-4 and a half minutes into a 9 minute clip.Would have liked to see more of Sharon Wild naked,but not a bad clip for what it is.

Nice ass-would not mind playing patty-kakes for a while.

Agreed,cap1 tells me she can suck my buddies cock-I'll keep looking.

Location is now a niche?Still waiting for finisher to make it in the books...Sure do like Kaylynn though.

First off,Incredible Digital-isn't.Not from a technical standpoint,not from a directorial standpoint and not from the talent either.Secondly,I realize that DVD's are most likely bought in batches-you're going to get various levels of quality.VB is probably making a pretty good dollar-why not just dump the bad ones,or the ones that subscribers bitch about the most and eat the cost?Lastly,I've heard repeatedly the VB is attempting to have "something" for everyone.I feel a little under represented here,as I'd like better porno on a consistent basis.

Julia Ann is fine,but otherwise what an assembly of mutts.I'd fuck 'em if I had the chance;wouldn't brag about it after-and I certainly don't want to view them here.