http://kobiata.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/rebecasecured.pdf

His real name is Brian Barnes. One of the most prolific male stars ever producing over 1000 scenes, the mad/crazed look in his eyes and pirate look were trademark, instrumental to his success (?) and the reason he has been cast so many many times. However, Barnes was sentenced to 11 years arising not from porno, but rather from the death of an 11-year old Bangladeshi immigrant boy in LA when a "road racing/raging" incident Barnes was involved in went terribly wrong. Will be fascinating to see whether some other "pirate" takes his place, and whether science will ever be able to establish a connection between real violence and "virtual" (real/unreeal?) that is porn today? Fascinating stuff...

Very interesting comment threads here and other places around VB on both sides arising from DP so as industry insider I add this comment: the primary motivation for the models (pornstars?) is money. And they make MORE money for each additional actor they "work with"... So what we are seeing, in short, is female actors who are maximizing revenue and VB is merely showing what is getting published.

Not my cup of tea, but live and live live is what I say. If it makes u happy, go for it.

Is this Laura Lion? Does Angel Dark also go as Laura Lion, or are these two different stars?

Splinkyermonkee2... Your comment is helpful and technically correct: yes 18 usc 2257 does require model releases BUT there is no requirement that this release is signed BEFORE its filmed, rather before its PUBLISHED... Therefore, in an odd but unintended result of US law, the bang bus genre (and others where they solicit strangers on the street) was borne. Yes, many of these girls are pros and they act their way through. But there are many models brought into the biz through solicitation at shopping malls, schools, etc... On a related point, there is a PhD dissertation out there somewhere - - where someone has analyzed how US law has actually HELPED the porn industry. Fascinating indeed.

This does not apply to contract girls, but there is almost a mathematical formula (for compensation), there are three main factors that determine porn star pay: 1) time, 2) how many men to be serviced during the shoot; and 3) how hard the sex. That is why we have all seen the inexorable trend toward multiple partners (more money), multiple holes (more money). Always wondered why the girls don't form some kind of union so they can increase bargaining power to get royalties (instead of being paid by scene only); and why attempts at regulating this industry have been ill-considered and feeble, although we should expect both of those things will come.

With few exceptions, the stunt dicks do back to back scenes keeping themselves hard with 100MG or more of Cialis. After start and stop again sex with camera and make up people on the set, the stunts dick simply gets hyper de sensitized and that is why they can only cum if they finish themselves. Seems lame, yes, but its more a result of how these actors are used, than it is about the director or the girl (not finishing).

VB and the net generally gives incredible exposure into wildly varying personal decisions made by individuals all over the world. So its not only entertainment but rather can be seen as a university. Offering classes on radical self expression (whether or not trans gender is radical or not) may not attract the masses. But those curious and freaky peeps who wanna learn are sure glad its on offer. Even though not my own personal cup of tea, long live personal freedom to make whatever decisions one wants without fear or retribution.

She posted on newyork.craigslist.org a few months ago... so I said f++ck it and paid the five hundred bucks to see her. Her OEM breasts were, in person, almost as amazing as her butt. I suggested she reconsider the bolt-ons, but she had already decided and said, "I am going double DD." Even though most prefer the naturals, perhaps the bolt-ons help get these girls exclusive contracts with big studios? Maybe the mounts are money makers? Any sexual economists out there with research data? Is there a Dolly Parton effect on wages for pornstars?